Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves has proposed a waiver that would restrict SNAP recipients from spending their benefits on foods and beverages considered “unhealthy.” The waiver aims to prevent the purchase of items high in sugar, cane sugar, corn syrup, or high-fructose corn syrup, especially when these are among the first two ingredients on the label.
If approved, the rule would ban sodas, sugary drinks, and other similar products containing carbonated water, cane sugar, or high-fructose corn syrup as their main ingredients.
What Items Would Still Be Allowed?
The waiver makes certain exceptions. SNAP users would still be able to buy:
- Single-ingredient sugars used for cooking and baking.
- Drinks containing non-caloric sweeteners, such as aspartame, among their top two ingredients.
- Hot prepared chicken, including rotisserie chicken, which the governor’s office classifies as a nutritious meal option.
These changes are designed to encourage healthier food choices while maintaining flexibility for practical, home-cooked meals.
Governor Reeves Calls It ‘Common Sense’
In an official statement, Governor Reeves described the plan as “just common sense,” emphasizing that taxpayer money should support essential and nutritious foods rather than sugary items.
“Welfare benefits are meant as a temporary hand-up, not a handout,” Reeves stated. “Taxpayers contribute strategically to help people live healthier and more fulfilling lives—physically and spiritually.”
He further explained that, given the current national debt and financial strain, it’s unreasonable to fund sugary products. Instead, he wants SNAP benefits to focus on wholesome meals like chicken and other sustaining foods.
Reeves also noted that similar waivers have already been approved by the Trump administration in 12 states, expressing confidence that Mississippi would soon follow suit.
SNAP Benefit Cuts Add to Concern
This proposal comes as the Mississippi Department of Human Services announced that SNAP benefits will be temporarily paused on November 1 due to the ongoing federal government shutdown. Many families relying on these benefits are already preparing for the financial impact, making the governor’s proposed restrictions an additional source of debate.
